On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About Oxylabs
- About NetNut
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where Oxylabs wins
- Where NetNut wins
- Oxylabs pros & cons
- NetNut pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
Oxylabs wins this matchup. It ranks #3 to NetNut’s #7 in our weighted benchmark, pairing claimed 100m+ residential ips with stronger overall scores. NetNut still makes sense where very fast, stable isp-routed connections is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Oxylabs | NetNut |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #3 of 15 | #7 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Entry price | $4.00/GB | $1.50/GB |
| IP pool | 100M+ | 52M+ |
| Success rate | 99.0% | 98.2% |
| Proxy types | 4 | 3 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 plus dedicated account managers | Dedicated manager, business-hours first |
About Oxylabs
Oxylabs is a polished, enterprise-first operation whose claim to fame is the largest declared residential pool in the business and unusually consistent benchmark numbers.
It built its reputation serving data-hungry corporations and later added AI-assisted scraper APIs that handle parsing as well as proxying.
About NetNut
NetNut is the speed specialist, routing through ISP backbones rather than end-user devices so throughput stays high even under heavy concurrency.
Its architecture grew out of direct ISP partnerships, which is why its static residential routes feel closer to datacenter performance than typical peer-to-peer pools.
Pricing compared
On paper: $4.00/GB (Oxylabs) versus $1.50/GB (NetNut). Factor retries at 99.0% and 98.2% success and the premium buys back some ground — always run both through a pilot before committing volume.
Performance compared
Our latency and throughput testing favoured NetNut (97 vs 96 speed index), while pool depth favours Oxylabs. Match the strength to your workload’s bottleneck.
Pool & coverage
Oxylabs declares 100M+ IPs against NetNut’s 52M+; Oxylabs offers city-level targeting. Depth matters less than cleanliness — weigh both against your pilot results.
Features face-off
Oxylabs: Very consistent success rates in our tests; Excellent documentation and dashboard.
NetNut: Built for high-volume pipelines; Unlimited concurrent sessions.
Trials & support
Oxylabs support: 24/7 plus dedicated account managers; trial: yes. NetNut support: Dedicated manager, business-hours first; trial: yes. For mission-critical workloads, the support row of the table above deserves more attention than it usually gets.
Where Oxylabs wins
- Claimed 100M+ residential IPs.
- You are large-scale scraping teams that value consistency over cost.
- Excellent documentation and dashboard.
Where NetNut wins
- You are always-on, high-throughput data pipelines.
- Built for high-volume pipelines.
- Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections.
Oxylabs pros & cons
- ✅ Claimed 100M+ residential IPs
- ✅ Very consistent success rates in our tests
- ✅ Excellent documentation and dashboard
- ⚠️ Premium pricing with higher minimums
- ⚠️ More machinery than small teams need
NetNut pros & cons
- ✅ Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections
- ✅ Built for high-volume pipelines
- ✅ Unlimited concurrent sessions
- ⚠️ Entry plans pricier at low volume
- ⚠️ No mobile pool
Consider the alternative
Before settling this matchup, price in our overall #1: Cheapest Proxies undercuts both ($0.80/GB) while posting a 99.4% success rate — the highest of the fifteen networks we benchmark.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Switching between these vendors is low-friction: both expose gateway-plus-credential access, so migration is usually a config change. Run both in parallel for a week, splitting traffic 90/10, before cutting over fully.
Comparison FAQ
Which has the bigger pool, Oxylabs or NetNut?
Oxylabs — 100M+ versus 52M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Can I use both Oxylabs and NetNut together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Do Oxylabs and NetNut offer free trials?
Oxylabs: yes. NetNut: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Is Oxylabs cheaper than NetNut?
Entry pricing: $4.00/GB vs $1.50/GB. No on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Which is better, Oxylabs or NetNut?
Oxylabs wins our weighted benchmark (#3 vs #7), combining claimed 100m+ residential ips with stronger value scores. NetNut remains the right call when always-on, high-throughput data pipelines matches your situation.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: Oxylabs review · NetNut review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Stop overpaying for IPs — start today
Thirty thousand users already route through our top pick. Validate it free against your own targets before spending a cent.