On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About NetNut
- About Webshare
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where NetNut wins
- Where Webshare wins
- NetNut pros & cons
- Webshare pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
Overall: NetNut. Our scoring (value 30%, speed 25%, pool 20%, features 15%, support 10%) puts it ahead at #7 versus #8. Choose Webshare instead when developers and testers wanting cheap datacenter IPs immediately describes you precisely.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | NetNut | Webshare |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #7 of 15 | #8 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Entry price | $1.50/GB | $2.99/mo |
| IP pool | 52M+ | 30M+ |
| Success rate | 98.2% | 96.8% |
| Proxy types | 3 | 3 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Country-level |
| Support | Dedicated manager, business-hours first | Ticket-based |
About NetNut
NetNut is the speed specialist, routing through ISP backbones rather than end-user devices so throughput stays high even under heavy concurrency.
Its architecture grew out of direct ISP partnerships, which is why its static residential routes feel closer to datacenter performance than typical peer-to-peer pools.
About Webshare
Webshare is the developer favourite, where a permanent free tier and instant self-serve checkout remove every excuse not to start experimenting today.
It won mindshare by giving away ten datacenter proxies free forever and letting engineers upgrade without ever talking to sales.
Pricing compared
NetNut starts at $1.50/GB against Webshare’s $2.99/mo. Raw stickers favour NetNut, but success rates adjust the picture: at 98.2% vs 96.8%, effective cost per successful request widens the gap further.
Performance compared
Speed indexes land at 97 (NetNut) vs 90 (Webshare) in our 100-point scale; pools of 52M+ and 30M+ respectively shape how each absorbs concurrency. For sustained high-volume work, both hold up.
Pool & coverage
NetNut declares 52M+ IPs against Webshare’s 30M+; NetNut offers city-level targeting while the other stops at country filters. Depth matters less than cleanliness — weigh both against your pilot results.
Features face-off
NetNut: Built for high-volume pipelines; Unlimited concurrent sessions.
Webshare: Cheapest entry into datacenter IPs; Instant, fully self-serve setup.
Trials & support
NetNut support: Dedicated manager, business-hours first; trial: yes. Webshare support: Ticket-based; trial: yes. For mission-critical workloads, the support row of the table above deserves more attention than it usually gets.
Where NetNut wins
- You are always-on, high-throughput data pipelines.
- Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections.
- Built for high-volume pipelines.
Where Webshare wins
- Instant, fully self-serve setup.
- You are developers and testers wanting cheap datacenter IPs immediately.
- Permanent free plan with 10 proxies.
NetNut pros & cons
- ✅ Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections
- ✅ Built for high-volume pipelines
- ✅ Unlimited concurrent sessions
- ⚠️ Entry plans pricier at low volume
- ⚠️ No mobile pool
Webshare pros & cons
- ✅ Permanent free plan with 10 proxies
- ✅ Cheapest entry into datacenter IPs
- ✅ Instant, fully self-serve setup
- ⚠️ Residential pool weaker than specialists
- ⚠️ Support is tickets only
Consider the alternative
Before settling this matchup, price in our overall #1: Cheapest Proxies undercuts both ($0.80/GB) while posting a 99.4% success rate — the highest of the fifteen networks we benchmark.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Treat migration as an experiment: replicate one pipeline on the challenger, compare success and effective cost over identical traffic, and let the numbers decide. Keep the loser’s account dormant as a failover.
Comparison FAQ
Which has the bigger pool, NetNut or Webshare?
NetNut — 52M+ versus 30M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Which is better, NetNut or Webshare?
NetNut wins our weighted benchmark (#7 vs #8), combining very fast, stable isp-routed connections with stronger value scores. Webshare remains the right call when developers and testers wanting cheap datacenter IPs immediately matches your situation.
Is NetNut cheaper than Webshare?
Entry pricing: $1.50/GB vs $2.99/mo. Yes on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Do NetNut and Webshare offer free trials?
NetNut: yes. Webshare: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Can I use both NetNut and Webshare together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: NetNut review · Webshare review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Your next data project deserves better proxies
Residential, ISP, datacenter and mobile IPs under one dashboard, from $0.80/GB, with no contracts and 24/7 support.