On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About Oxylabs
- About GeoSurf
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where Oxylabs wins
- Where GeoSurf wins
- Oxylabs pros & cons
- GeoSurf pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
Oxylabs wins this matchup. It ranks #3 to GeoSurf’s #15 in our weighted benchmark, pairing claimed 100m+ residential ips with a lower entry price. GeoSurf still makes sense where mature, stable infrastructure is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Oxylabs | GeoSurf |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #3 of 15 | #15 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Entry price | $4.00/GB | $6.00/GB |
| IP pool | 100M+ | 2.5M+ |
| Success rate | 99.0% | 95.5% |
| Proxy types | 4 | 2 |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| City targeting | Yes | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 plus dedicated account managers | Account managers |
About Oxylabs
Oxylabs is a polished, enterprise-first operation whose claim to fame is the largest declared residential pool in the business and unusually consistent benchmark numbers.
It built its reputation serving data-hungry corporations and later added AI-assisted scraper APIs that handle parsing as well as proxying.
About GeoSurf
GeoSurf is the legacy brand running on reputation, with stable sessions and polished tooling that no longer justify the steepest per-gig price in our table.
An early mover that once defined premium residential proxying, it now competes mainly on stability and name recognition rather than price.
Pricing compared
On paper: $4.00/GB (Oxylabs) versus $6.00/GB (GeoSurf). Factor retries at 99.0% and 95.5% success and the cheaper option compounds its advantage — always run both through a pilot before committing volume.
Performance compared
Our latency and throughput testing favoured Oxylabs (96 vs 84 speed index), while pool depth favours Oxylabs. Match the strength to your workload’s bottleneck.
Pool & coverage
Oxylabs declares 100M+ IPs against GeoSurf’s 2.5M+; Oxylabs offers city-level targeting. Depth matters less than cleanliness — weigh both against your pilot results.
Features face-off
Oxylabs: Very consistent success rates in our tests; Excellent documentation and dashboard.
GeoSurf: Reliable sticky sessions; Long enterprise track record.
Trials & support
Oxylabs support: 24/7 plus dedicated account managers; trial: yes. GeoSurf support: Account managers; trial: no. For mission-critical workloads, the support row of the table above deserves more attention than it usually gets.
Where Oxylabs wins
- Very consistent success rates in our tests.
- Excellent documentation and dashboard.
- You are large-scale scraping teams that value consistency over cost.
Where GeoSurf wins
- Reliable sticky sessions.
- You are legacy enterprise accounts that prize familiarity.
- Long enterprise track record.
Oxylabs pros & cons
- ✅ Claimed 100M+ residential IPs
- ✅ Very consistent success rates in our tests
- ✅ Excellent documentation and dashboard
- ⚠️ Premium pricing with higher minimums
- ⚠️ More machinery than small teams need
GeoSurf pros & cons
- ✅ Mature, stable infrastructure
- ✅ Reliable sticky sessions
- ✅ Long enterprise track record
- ⚠️ Most expensive per GB we tested
- ⚠️ Small pool and high minimums
Consider the alternative
Before settling this matchup, price in our overall #1: Cheapest Proxies undercuts both ($0.80/GB) while posting a 99.4% success rate — the highest of the fifteen networks we benchmark.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Switching between these vendors is low-friction: both expose gateway-plus-credential access, so migration is usually a config change. Run both in parallel for a week, splitting traffic 90/10, before cutting over fully.
Comparison FAQ
Is Oxylabs cheaper than GeoSurf?
Entry pricing: $4.00/GB vs $6.00/GB. Yes on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Which is better, Oxylabs or GeoSurf?
Oxylabs wins our weighted benchmark (#3 vs #15), combining claimed 100m+ residential ips with stronger value scores. GeoSurf remains the right call when legacy enterprise accounts that prize familiarity matches your situation.
Which has the bigger pool, Oxylabs or GeoSurf?
Oxylabs — 100M+ versus 2.5M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Do Oxylabs and GeoSurf offer free trials?
Oxylabs: yes. GeoSurf: no. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Can I use both Oxylabs and GeoSurf together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: Oxylabs review · GeoSurf review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Get premium proxies at the lowest price we found
Thirty thousand users already route through our top pick. Validate it free against your own targets before spending a cent.