On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About SOAX
- About NetNut
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where SOAX wins
- Where NetNut wins
- SOAX pros & cons
- NetNut pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
SOAX wins this matchup. It ranks #6 to NetNut’s #7 in our weighted benchmark, pairing frequently refreshed, clean ip pool with stronger overall scores. NetNut still makes sense where very fast, stable isp-routed connections is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | SOAX | NetNut |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #6 of 15 | #7 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Entry price | $3.30/GB | $1.50/GB |
| IP pool | 8.5M+ | 52M+ |
| Success rate | 97.5% | 98.2% |
| Proxy types | 3 | 3 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Dedicated manager, business-hours first |
About SOAX
SOAX is a quality-over-quantity network that vets its pool aggressively, making it a favourite for social platforms where IP reputation is everything.
Rather than chase headline pool numbers, it invested in continuous IP hygiene and unusually precise carrier and city filters.
About NetNut
NetNut is the speed specialist, routing through ISP backbones rather than end-user devices so throughput stays high even under heavy concurrency.
Its architecture grew out of direct ISP partnerships, which is why its static residential routes feel closer to datacenter performance than typical peer-to-peer pools.
Pricing compared
SOAX starts at $3.30/GB against NetNut’s $1.50/GB. Raw stickers favour NetNut, but success rates adjust the picture: at 97.5% vs 98.2%, effective cost per successful request widens the gap further.
Performance compared
Our latency and throughput testing favoured NetNut (97 vs 88 speed index), while pool depth favours NetNut. Match the strength to your workload’s bottleneck.
Pool & coverage
Coverage: 8.5M+ (SOAX) vs 52M+ (NetNut). For geo-sensitive work note that city targeting is available on both.
Features face-off
SOAX: Precise city and carrier targeting; Strong on mobile and social use cases.
NetNut: Built for high-volume pipelines; Unlimited concurrent sessions.
Trials & support
SOAX support: 24/7 chat; trial: yes. NetNut support: Dedicated manager, business-hours first; trial: yes. Responsiveness becomes decisive the night a pipeline breaks — weight it accordingly.
Where SOAX wins
- Precise city and carrier targeting.
- You are social media managers and mobile-first data work.
- Strong on mobile and social use cases.
Where NetNut wins
- You are always-on, high-throughput data pipelines.
- Built for high-volume pipelines.
- Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections.
SOAX pros & cons
- ✅ Frequently refreshed, clean IP pool
- ✅ Precise city and carrier targeting
- ✅ Strong on mobile and social use cases
- ⚠️ Smaller pool than the big names
- ⚠️ Premium-leaning pricing
NetNut pros & cons
- ✅ Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections
- ✅ Built for high-volume pipelines
- ✅ Unlimited concurrent sessions
- ⚠️ Entry plans pricier at low volume
- ⚠️ No mobile pool
Consider the alternative
Worth knowing: neither side of this duel tops our table. Cheapest Proxies does, at $0.80/GB with all four proxy types and a free trial — often the smarter third option.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Switching between these vendors is low-friction: both expose gateway-plus-credential access, so migration is usually a config change. Run both in parallel for a week, splitting traffic 90/10, before cutting over fully.
Comparison FAQ
Do SOAX and NetNut offer free trials?
SOAX: yes. NetNut: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Is SOAX cheaper than NetNut?
Entry pricing: $3.30/GB vs $1.50/GB. No on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Can I use both SOAX and NetNut together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Which is better, SOAX or NetNut?
SOAX wins our weighted benchmark (#6 vs #7), combining frequently refreshed, clean ip pool with stronger value scores. NetNut remains the right call when always-on, high-throughput data pipelines matches your situation.
Which has the bigger pool, SOAX or NetNut?
NetNut — 52M+ versus 8.5M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: SOAX review · NetNut review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Stop overpaying for IPs — start today
One account, four proxy types, 195+ countries and pay-as-you-go pricing that respects your budget.