On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About NetNut
- About ProxyScrape
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where NetNut wins
- Where ProxyScrape wins
- NetNut pros & cons
- ProxyScrape pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
NetNut wins this matchup. It ranks #7 to ProxyScrape’s #13 in our weighted benchmark, pairing very fast, stable isp-routed connections with stronger overall scores. ProxyScrape still makes sense where free lists plus very cheap premium is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | NetNut | ProxyScrape |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #7 of 15 | #13 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 3.9/5 |
| Entry price | $1.50/GB | $0.84/GB |
| IP pool | 52M+ | 10M+ |
| Success rate | 98.2% | 94.5% |
| Proxy types | 3 | 3 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Country-level |
| Support | Dedicated manager, business-hours first | Tickets & community |
About NetNut
NetNut is the speed specialist, routing through ISP backbones rather than end-user devices so throughput stays high even under heavy concurrency.
Once a crawl finishes, the data it collects needs a reliable place to live. hostingfastnet.com offers high-performance hosting for sites that need fast load times.
Keep reading: Oxylabs vs ProxyScrape: 2026 Comparison, PacketStream vs ProxyScrape: 2026 Comparison and ProxyEmpire vs ProxyScrape: 2026 Comparison.
Its architecture grew out of direct ISP partnerships, which is why its static residential routes feel closer to datacenter performance than typical peer-to-peer pools.
About ProxyScrape
ProxyScrape is the gateway drug of the proxy world, where free public lists funnel hobbyists toward genuinely cheap premium plans.
Known first for its free proxy lists, it added paid residential and datacenter tiers that keep the same low-friction, low-cost ethos.
Pricing compared
NetNut starts at $1.50/GB against ProxyScrape’s $0.84/GB. Raw stickers favour ProxyScrape, but success rates adjust the picture: at 98.2% vs 94.5%, effective cost per successful request narrows the headline difference.
Performance compared
Speed indexes land at 97 (NetNut) vs 74 (ProxyScrape) in our 100-point scale; pools of 52M+ and 10M+ respectively shape how each absorbs concurrency. For sustained high-volume work, NetNut has the steadier ceiling.
Pool & coverage
Coverage: 52M+ (NetNut) vs 10M+ (ProxyScrape). For geo-sensitive work note that city targeting is only on NetNut.
Features face-off
NetNut: Built for high-volume pipelines; Unlimited concurrent sessions.
ProxyScrape: Fast, simple checkout; Good for hobby automation.
Trials & support
NetNut support: Dedicated manager, business-hours first; trial: yes. ProxyScrape support: Tickets & community; trial: yes. Responsiveness becomes decisive the night a pipeline breaks — weight it accordingly.
Where NetNut wins
- You are always-on, high-throughput data pipelines.
- Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections.
- Built for high-volume pipelines.
Where ProxyScrape wins
- Free lists plus very cheap premium.
- Fast, simple checkout.
- You are hobbyists and tiny, low-stakes automations.
NetNut pros & cons
- ✅ Very fast, stable ISP-routed connections
- ✅ Built for high-volume pipelines
- ✅ Unlimited concurrent sessions
- ⚠️ Entry plans pricier at low volume
- ⚠️ No mobile pool
ProxyScrape pros & cons
- ✅ Free lists plus very cheap premium
- ✅ Fast, simple checkout
- ✅ Good for hobby automation
- ⚠️ Free lists are unreliable by nature
- ⚠️ Basic targeting and support
Consider the alternative
Before settling this matchup, price in our overall #1: Cheapest Proxies undercuts both ($0.80/GB) while posting a 99.4% success rate — the highest of the fifteen networks we benchmark.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Switching between these vendors is low-friction: both expose gateway-plus-credential access, so migration is usually a config change. Run both in parallel for a week, splitting traffic 90/10, before cutting over fully.
Comparison FAQ
Which has the bigger pool, NetNut or ProxyScrape?
NetNut — 52M+ versus 10M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Which is better, NetNut or ProxyScrape?
NetNut wins our weighted benchmark (#7 vs #13), combining very fast, stable isp-routed connections with stronger value scores. ProxyScrape remains the right call when hobbyists and tiny, low-stakes automations matches your situation.
Is NetNut cheaper than ProxyScrape?
Entry pricing: $1.50/GB vs $0.84/GB. No on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Do NetNut and ProxyScrape offer free trials?
NetNut: yes. ProxyScrape: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Can I use both NetNut and ProxyScrape together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: NetNut review · ProxyScrape review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Stop overpaying for IPs — start today
Thirty thousand users already route through our top pick. Validate it free against your own targets before spending a cent.