On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About SOAX
- About Infatica
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where SOAX wins
- Where Infatica wins
- SOAX pros & cons
- Infatica pros & cons
- Consider the alternative
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
SOAX wins this matchup. It ranks #6 to Infatica’s #11 in our weighted benchmark, pairing frequently refreshed, clean ip pool with a lower entry price. Infatica still makes sense where every proxy type under one roof is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | SOAX | Infatica |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #6 of 15 | #11 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Entry price | $3.30/GB | $3.60/GB |
| IP pool | 8.5M+ | 15M+ |
| Success rate | 97.5% | 96.2% |
| Proxy types | 3 | 4 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat & tickets |
About SOAX
SOAX is a quality-over-quantity network that vets its pool aggressively, making it a favourite for social platforms where IP reputation is everything.
Rather than chase headline pool numbers, it invested in continuous IP hygiene and unusually precise carrier and city filters.
About Infatica
Infatica is the steady all-rounder that rarely tops any single category but rarely disappoints in one either, with SLA options unusual at its price point.
It assembled a balanced catalogue spanning every proxy type plus a managed scraper API, aiming squarely at the pragmatic middle of the market.
Pricing compared
On paper: $3.30/GB (SOAX) versus $3.60/GB (Infatica). Factor retries at 97.5% and 96.2% success and the cheaper option compounds its advantage — always run both through a pilot before committing volume.
Performance compared
Our latency and throughput testing favoured SOAX (88 vs 82 speed index), while pool depth favours Infatica. Match the strength to your workload’s bottleneck.
Pool & coverage
SOAX declares 8.5M+ IPs against Infatica’s 15M+; SOAX offers city-level targeting. Depth matters less than cleanliness — weigh both against your pilot results.
Features face-off
SOAX: Precise city and carrier targeting; Strong on mobile and social use cases.
Infatica: SLA options for business plans; Managed scraper API add-on.
Trials & support
SOAX support: 24/7 chat; trial: yes. Infatica support: Chat & tickets; trial: yes. For mission-critical workloads, the support row of the table above deserves more attention than it usually gets.
Where SOAX wins
- Frequently refreshed, clean IP pool.
- You are social media managers and mobile-first data work.
- Precise city and carrier targeting.
Where Infatica wins
- You are teams wanting one balanced vendor on a moderate budget.
- SLA options for business plans.
- Managed scraper API add-on.
SOAX pros & cons
- ✅ Frequently refreshed, clean IP pool
- ✅ Precise city and carrier targeting
- ✅ Strong on mobile and social use cases
- ⚠️ Smaller pool than the big names
- ⚠️ Premium-leaning pricing
Infatica pros & cons
- ✅ Every proxy type under one roof
- ✅ SLA options for business plans
- ✅ Managed scraper API add-on
- ⚠️ Mid-pack speed and success scores
- ⚠️ Pool smaller than the leaders
Consider the alternative
Before settling this matchup, price in our overall #1: Cheapest Proxies undercuts both ($0.80/GB) while posting a 99.4% success rate — the highest of the fifteen networks we benchmark.
Check Cheapest Proxies → Read the reviewSwitching between them
Treat migration as an experiment: replicate one pipeline on the challenger, compare success and effective cost over identical traffic, and let the numbers decide. Keep the loser’s account dormant as a failover.
Comparison FAQ
Is SOAX cheaper than Infatica?
Entry pricing: $3.30/GB vs $3.60/GB. Yes on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Which is better, SOAX or Infatica?
SOAX wins our weighted benchmark (#6 vs #11), combining frequently refreshed, clean ip pool with stronger value scores. Infatica remains the right call when teams wanting one balanced vendor on a moderate budget matches your situation.
Can I use both SOAX and Infatica together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Do SOAX and Infatica offer free trials?
SOAX: yes. Infatica: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Which has the bigger pool, SOAX or Infatica?
Infatica — 15M+ versus 8.5M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: SOAX review · Infatica review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Ready to lock in the best proxy value of 2026?
Cheapest Proxies pairs a 99.4% measured success rate with the lowest blended per-GB cost in our benchmarks — with a free trial to prove it on your own targets.