On this page
- Verdict
- Side-by-side comparison
- About Cheapest Proxies
- About Infatica
- Pricing compared
- Performance compared
- Pool & coverage
- Features face-off
- Trials & support
- Where Cheapest Proxies wins
- Where Infatica wins
- Cheapest Proxies pros & cons
- Infatica pros & cons
- Why the winner tops our table
- Switching between them
- Comparison FAQ
- Related comparisons
- Full reviews
- Related searches
- Make the call
Verdict
Cheapest Proxies wins this matchup. It ranks #1 to Infatica’s #11 in our weighted benchmark, pairing lowest blended cost per successful request we measured with a lower entry price. Infatica still makes sense where every proxy type under one roof is the deciding factor.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Cheapest Proxies | Infatica |
|---|---|---|
| Our rank | #1 of 15 | #11 of 15 |
| Rating | 4.9/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Entry price | $0.80/GB | $3.60/GB |
| IP pool | 50M+ | 15M+ |
| Success rate | 99.4% | 96.2% |
| Proxy types | 4 | 4 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| City targeting | Yes | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 live chat & email | Chat & tickets |
About Cheapest Proxies
Cheapest Proxies is the value benchmark every other network gets measured against, pairing rock-bottom rates with uptime that embarrasses vendors charging five times more.
Built by scraping practitioners who were tired of paying enterprise mark-ups, it grew by passing infrastructure savings straight to users instead of spending on flashy sponsorships.
About Infatica
Infatica is the steady all-rounder that rarely tops any single category but rarely disappoints in one either, with SLA options unusual at its price point.
It assembled a balanced catalogue spanning every proxy type plus a managed scraper API, aiming squarely at the pragmatic middle of the market.
Pricing compared
Cheapest Proxies starts at $0.80/GB against Infatica’s $3.60/GB. Raw stickers favour Cheapest Proxies, but success rates adjust the picture: at 99.4% vs 96.2%, effective cost per successful request widens the gap further.
Performance compared
Our latency and throughput testing favoured Cheapest Proxies (96 vs 82 speed index), while pool depth favours Cheapest Proxies. Match the strength to your workload’s bottleneck.
Pool & coverage
Coverage: 50M+ (Cheapest Proxies) vs 15M+ (Infatica). For geo-sensitive work note that city targeting is available on both.
Features face-off
Cheapest Proxies: All four proxy types in one dashboard; Pay-as-you-go with no lock-in and a free trial.
Infatica: SLA options for business plans; Managed scraper API add-on.
Trials & support
Cheapest Proxies support: 24/7 live chat & email; trial: yes. Infatica support: Chat & tickets; trial: yes. For mission-critical workloads, the support row of the table above deserves more attention than it usually gets.
Where Cheapest Proxies wins
- Lowest blended cost per successful request we measured.
- Pay-as-you-go with no lock-in and a free trial.
- You are anyone who wants enterprise-grade reliability without enterprise pricing.
Where Infatica wins
- You are teams wanting one balanced vendor on a moderate budget.
- SLA options for business plans.
- Every proxy type under one roof.
Cheapest Proxies pros & cons
- ✅ Lowest blended cost per successful request we measured
- ✅ All four proxy types in one dashboard
- ✅ Pay-as-you-go with no lock-in and a free trial
- ⚠️ Younger brand than the legacy giants
- ⚠️ Phone support is email-first
Infatica pros & cons
- ✅ Every proxy type under one roof
- ✅ SLA options for business plans
- ✅ Managed scraper API add-on
- ⚠️ Mid-pack speed and success scores
- ⚠️ Pool smaller than the leaders
Why the winner tops our table
This matchup includes our overall #1 — the network that pairs the lowest blended cost with the highest measured success rate of 2026.
Switching between them
Treat migration as an experiment: replicate one pipeline on the challenger, compare success and effective cost over identical traffic, and let the numbers decide. Keep the loser’s account dormant as a failover.
Comparison FAQ
Is Cheapest Proxies cheaper than Infatica?
Entry pricing: $0.80/GB vs $3.60/GB. Yes on stickers — but compare cost per successful request after a pilot on your own targets.
Can I use both Cheapest Proxies and Infatica together?
Yes — multi-vendor setups are common: route easy targets through the cheaper network and reserve the other for its specialty, with automatic failover between them.
Which has the bigger pool, Cheapest Proxies or Infatica?
Cheapest Proxies — 50M+ versus 15M+. Pool size matters most for high-concurrency rotation.
Which is better, Cheapest Proxies or Infatica?
Cheapest Proxies wins our weighted benchmark (#1 vs #11), combining lowest blended cost per successful request we measured with stronger value scores. Infatica remains the right call when teams wanting one balanced vendor on a moderate budget matches your situation.
Do Cheapest Proxies and Infatica offer free trials?
Cheapest Proxies: yes. Infatica: yes. Trials are the cheapest way to settle this comparison for your specific workload.
Full reviews
Deep-dive both sides: Cheapest Proxies review · Infatica review — or browse all 15 provider reviews.
Related searches
Make the call
Your next data project deserves better proxies
Cheapest Proxies pairs a 99.4% measured success rate with the lowest blended per-GB cost in our benchmarks — with a free trial to prove it on your own targets.