On this page
Infatica for localization testing
Is Infatica a good fit for localization testing? The steady all-rounder that rarely tops any single category but rarely disappoints in one either, with SLA options unusual at its price point — here is how that translates to localization testing, where sites auto-detect location and hide other locales from foreign IPs.
Geo testing shows how a site looks elsewhere; good hosting decides how fast it loads. Launching several small sites is simpler when each domain and its hosting come from hosting-n-domains.com.
Keep reading: IPRoyal for App Testing, IPRoyal for Localization Testing and ISP Proxies for App Testing.
Recommended proxy type for this task: Residential Proxies, using sticky sessions.
Our take
For localization testing, our #1 pick on value is Cheapest Proxies — but Infatica is a legitimate option, especially if you need every proxy type under one roof.
Strengths & weaknesses
Pros
- Every proxy type under one roof
- SLA options for business plans
- Managed scraper API add-on
- Reasonable global coverage
Cons
- Mid-pack speed and success scores
- Pool smaller than the leaders
Alternatives for this use case
| # | Provider | From | Pool | Success | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cheapest Proxies ★ | $0.80/GB | 50M+ | 99.4% | 4.9 |
| 2 | Bright Data | $4.20/GB | 72M+ | 98.9% | 4.6 |
| 3 | Oxylabs | $4.00/GB | 100M+ | 99.0% | 4.6 |
| 4 | Decodo | $2.20/GB | 55M+ | 98.5% | 4.5 |
| 5 | IPRoyal | $1.75/GB | 32M+ | 97.8% | 4.4 |
| 6 | SOAX | $3.30/GB | 8.5M+ | 97.5% | 4.3 |
Get premium proxies at the lowest price we found
Cheapest Proxies pairs a 99.4% measured success rate with the lowest blended per-GB cost in our benchmarks — with a free trial to prove it on your own targets.