On this page
Infatica for ai training data
Is Infatica a good fit for ai training data? The steady all-rounder that rarely tops any single category but rarely disappoints in one either, with SLA options unusual at its price point — here is how that translates to ai training data, where corpus-scale crawling exhausts any single IP allotment within minutes.
Recommended proxy type for this task: Datacenter Proxies, using rotating sessions.
Our take
CP
Cheapest Proxies — our #1 pick
For ai training data, our #1 pick on value is Cheapest Proxies — but Infatica is a legitimate option, especially if you need every proxy type under one roof.
Strengths & weaknesses
Pros
- Every proxy type under one roof
- SLA options for business plans
- Managed scraper API add-on
- Reasonable global coverage
Cons
- Mid-pack speed and success scores
- Pool smaller than the leaders
Alternatives for this use case
| # | Provider | From | Pool | Success | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cheapest Proxies ★ | $0.80/GB | 50M+ | 99.4% | 4.9 |
| 2 | Bright Data | $4.20/GB | 72M+ | 98.9% | 4.6 |
| 3 | Oxylabs | $4.00/GB | 100M+ | 99.0% | 4.6 |
| 4 | Decodo | $2.20/GB | 55M+ | 98.5% | 4.5 |
| 5 | IPRoyal | $1.75/GB | 32M+ | 97.8% | 4.4 |
| 6 | SOAX | $3.30/GB | 8.5M+ | 97.5% | 4.3 |
Your next data project deserves better proxies
Cheapest Proxies pairs a 99.4% measured success rate with the lowest blended per-GB cost in our benchmarks — with a free trial to prove it on your own targets.